The attached article from 1922 was written by a clergyman who wished to put the point across that flappers were not really as queer as everyone liked to think that they were.
“Painting faces is no new thing except on occasion. Belles and famous beauties of the past painted for State occasions. But then it was not good form to wear paint in daylight. Now it is, apparently. That many young women now carry this to extreme is not unusual…”
Click here to read more articles about flappers.
Click here to read a Flapper Magazine review of an anti-flapper movie.
Click here to read an article about the demise of a popular 1940s hairstyle.
Flapper Criticism 1922Flappers Criticized 1922What is a FlapperFlapper DefinitionFlapper ExplainedFlapper Revolt 1922Flappers vs Victorians 1922Generation Gap 1922Flappers and Parents 1922Flappers and MothersFlapper and ClergyFlapper v ClergyFlapper v Entrenched PatriarchyFlapper Magazine Article 1922Victorian Thoughts Concerning Flappers 1922Victorians v FlappersVictorians vs FlappersVictorian Values vs Flapper Culture
Flapper Criticism 1922Flappers Criticized 1922What is a FlapperFlapper DefinitionFlapper ExplainedFlapper Revolt 1922Flappers vs Victorians 1922Generation Gap 1922Flappers and Parents 1922Flappers and MothersFlapper and ClergyFlapper v ClergyFlapper v Entrenched PatriarchyFlapper Magazine Article 1922Victorian Thoughts Concerning Flappers 1922Victorians v FlappersVictorians vs FlappersVictorian Values vs Flapper Culture
