The Charm Offensive... (Yank Magazine, 1943)
This cautionary article seems like a collaboration between Emily Post and Sigmund Freud: it concerns one-part social instruction and one-part psychology. It offers wise words to the Yank readers as how best to behave when being interrogated by Axis goons; American mothers would have been proud to know that their tax dollars were well-spent advising their progeny to keep in mind manners, manners, manners and always anticipate the direction of the conversation: "It's best to call your enemy questioner "Sir" or his rank, if you can figure out what it is. Then when you answer "I'm sorry, sir" to his questions, there isn't much he can do about it..."
| Emily Post on Language (Photoplay, 1939)
At the tail-end of a very long interview concerning the problems with Hollywood movies, Emily Post (1872 – 1960), America's high-priestess of good manners, was asked just one more question - this one involved the English language and here is Emily Post's 1939 list of what to say and what not to say.
"Don't say 'brainy' - say, 'clever'.
Don't say 'wealthy', say 'rich'.
Don't say 'Charmed or pleased to meet you', say 'how do you do'.
etc, etc, etc.
Emily Post had so many opinions...
| The Fine Art of Introduction (Vanity Fair, 1917)
Stephen Leacock (1869 - 1944) had some amusing opinions concerning social introductions according to the recognized formulas. "With the approach of the winter season, conversation as an art is again in order. It is a thing that we all need to consider. Some of us are asked out to dinner merely because we talk. Others, chiefly because we do not. It is a matter in which we can help one another. Let us discuss it..." Click here to read about feminine conversations overheard in the best New York nightclubs of 1937.
| The English Country House: What Good Is It? (Vogue Magazine, 1914)
The author of this Vogue essay needed to know the answer to this most relevant of questions: did the English country house come into being simply to "keep the English playwright from the bread-lines."
| London Society, 1915 (Vanity Fair, 1915)
Five months into the "general unpleasantness" going on across the Channel had transformed London into a very different city, and sadly, it was the leisured classes that had to shoulder most of the burden:"London is well worth living in these troubled days if only for its contrasts...The gloom of the streets, the sinister play of the searchlights, the abnormal hour at which the theatres open and and the public houses close, the fact that half the male population is in khaki and the other half would like to be, that Society is wearing Noha's Ark clothes and that to buy a new hat is a crime, that there are no dances, no dinners, no suppers, no premieres, no shooting, no no posing, no frivolity, nor idling, it's rather quickening, you know. But the searchlights have absolutely killed all practical romance."
|
MORE ARTICLES >>> PAGE: * 1 * 2 * > NEXT |
|
